The Internet as a democratizing and liberating medium is
a frequent theme in discussions on the social utility of New Media. In Writing
for the Internet, Camille Paglia describes the Internet as a ‘potentially
universal medium’, one that will bring us to the mountain by democratizing what
were formerly rigid hierarchal mediums, with a focus on academia and the news
in this essay. The losers in this new digital frontier are the rigid old
print-based publications, and for reasons unexplained, academic critical
theorists and post-structuralists.
While the Internet may open access to many different
channels for a wider range of people, the article seems to take as given that
the content of these channels are valuable. Paglia compares Internet publishing
and writing to call-in radio shows, which she talks with a nostalgic reverence.
This nostalgia and ironic attachment to such channels shields the fact that
most call-in radio shows are exercises in banality, anti-intellectualism, and
cross-eyed spectacle. Accompanying the rise of ‘crowd-sourcing’ and the ‘let
the consumers decide!’ is an increase in the popularity of bite-sized,
Youtube-friendly- bloggable junk. What rises to the top of the Internet
cesspool is what most people settle on is good, the very definition of the
lowest common denominator.
No comments:
Post a Comment