This is the class blog for the COMM 2500 Introduction to New Media/Participatory Media class offered during the summer of 2012 at Fordham University, Rose Hill Campus.
Showing posts with label digital vs. analogical. Show all posts
Showing posts with label digital vs. analogical. Show all posts
Saturday, June 9, 2012
Digital vs Analogical
During Wednesday's class, we focused primarily on a comparison between digital and analogical. A digital system is composed of discrete units- namely letters (the alphabet), numbers ands words (language). "In between" values do not exist in digital. On the other hand, we learn that analogical is constituted of continuous units whose values change over time. In terms of measurement, analogical systems have values that are never exactly the same and can infinite values in a range; thus, taking up more room. Conversely, digital is all about counting and acquiring a precise value. Digital is more compact which is why it is incorporated in the many new media technologies, i.e. digitalizing voice in the telephone system and computers. Digitalization has revolutionized the way we see and do things. For example, in class we discussed the impact of digital on copying. When reproducing data, the content is retained and nothing is lost. It has also made it easier to edit things such as pictures and documents via the computer. With all the features and possibilities it has to offer, digitalization serves an imagination stimulant. Through technology that is fueled by digital systems, a whole new creative realm is unleashed.
Friday, June 8, 2012
Digital and Analogical
The other night
we discussed the difference between digital and analogical. Digital are
discrete units such as words, numbers and letters that have no resemblance to
anything. In addition, digital
allows editing to be much easier. It is also more compact and leaves more space
available. The problems that come with digitalization, is that it allows for
easier plagiarism. However, it is also positive because it allows new
creativity. On the other hand, analogical means literally non-logical but, it
is something continuous and has resemblance to other things such as time and
pictures. Furthermore, analogical requires more space than digital things such
as DVR. In addition we were introduced to Marshall McLuhan. He had some very interesting
ideas such as the “medium is the message or massage.” It is like a massage
because it works and shapes us over a period of time. Furthermore he is known
as “the oracle of the electric age” since he predicted Internet or something
like the works of Google. Another thing that was fascinating is that he
believes the generation gap in neurological. This is because books are no
longer “king” and the electronic use caused a direct affect in the nervous
system, transforming human nature. He also believed that humanity could be
intertwined for good or bad through electronics. I’m very interested to read
more about him.
Thursday, June 7, 2012
Digital vs. Analogical - Class Lecture 6/7
We covered the difference between digital and analogical technologies in class on Wednesday. Digital refers to anything composed of discrete units (that are also arbitrary), such as numbers, letters, words, and more generally, language. Digital units are, essentially, zeros and ones. Analogical refers to anything composed of continuous units. As opposed to being arbitrary like digital units, analogical units must contain a resemblance or structural similarity to what they represent. Pictures are an example of analogical units. Digital, it seems, will win out over analogical for three reasons. First, it takes less space than analogical units. Second, digital products are easier to copy than their analogical counterparts. Last, it is easier to edit digital media than analogical media.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)